Cabo Verde vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity

Cabo Verde
3.28 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
3.55 kg CO2eq/kg
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
4th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
6th

Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
02468196119922023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 3.55 kg CO2eq/kg against 3.28 kg CO2eq/kg in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.27 kg CO2eq/kg.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Cabo Verde ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th of 29 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 4.38 kg CO2eq/kg 7.05 kg CO2eq/kg 2.67 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1970s 4.22 kg CO2eq/kg 7.02 kg CO2eq/kg 2.81 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1980s 4.33 kg CO2eq/kg 6.6 kg CO2eq/kg 2.27 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1990s 3.59 kg CO2eq/kg 5.94 kg CO2eq/kg 2.35 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 3.4 kg CO2eq/kg 5.53 kg CO2eq/kg 2.13 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 3.38 kg CO2eq/kg 4.94 kg CO2eq/kg 1.55 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 3.28 kg CO2eq/kg 3.68 kg CO2eq/kg 0.3954 kg CO2eq/kg Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity, Cabo Verde or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 3.55 kg CO2eq/kg against 3.28 kg CO2eq/kg in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity between Cabo Verde and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
0.27 kg CO2eq/kg, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for raw milk of cattle — emissions intensity?
Cabo Verde ranks 4th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 6th of 29 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-intensity/cabo-verde-2/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-emissions-intensity/cabo-verde-2/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Cabo Verde vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Emissions intensity
Unit
kg CO2eq/kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
231 places, 13,132 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions intensities contains analytical data on the intensity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by agricultural commodity. This indicator is defined as greenhouse gas emissions per kg of product. Data are available for a set of agricultural commodities (e.g. rice and other cereals, meat, milk, eggs), by country, with global coverage.