Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Rice — Area harvested

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4.99 million ha
in 2050
OECD
4.23 million ha
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
OECD rank
11th

Rice — Area harvested over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • OECD
02.0M4.0M6.0M196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 4.99 million ha against 4.23 million ha in OECD, a difference of 759,610 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.2 times OECD's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and OECD ranks 11th of 32 groups.

Across the 9 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and OECD in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 2.43 million ha 5.79 million ha 3.36 million ha OECD
1970s 2.55 million ha 5.52 million ha 2.97 million ha OECD
1980s 2.65 million ha 5.31 million ha 2.66 million ha OECD
1990s 3.21 million ha 5.07 million ha 1.85 million ha OECD
2000s 3.68 million ha 4.58 million ha 902,003 ha OECD
2010s 4.50 million ha 4.18 million ha 318,587 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 5.07 million ha 3.89 million ha 1.19 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 4.50 million ha 4.56 million ha 56,330 ha OECD
2050s 4.99 million ha 4.23 million ha 759,610 ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — area harvested, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or OECD?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 4.99 million ha against 4.23 million ha in OECD as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — area harvested between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD?
759,610 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD rank globally for rice — area harvested?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and OECD ranks 11th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Rice — Area harvested. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-area-harvested-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-area-harvested-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/oecd/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Rice — Area harvested</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Area harvested
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).