Australia and New Zealand vs Guyana: Rice — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
62,855 t
in 2050
Guyana
65,238 t
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
50th
Guyana rank
47th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Guyana
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k196120052050

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 65,238 t against 62,855 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2,383 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and Guyana ranks 47th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Guyana in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 14,168 t 63,287 t 49,119 t Guyana
1970s 37,292 t 59,046 t 21,754 t Guyana
1980s 58,938 t 45,810 t 13,127 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 72,446 t 60,399 t 12,047 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 41,197 t 63,384 t 22,187 t Guyana
2010s 34,948 t 89,358 t 54,410 t Guyana
2020s 22,664 t 90,516 t 67,853 t Guyana
2030s 51,635 t 63,532 t 11,897 t Guyana
2050s 62,855 t 65,238 t 2,383 t Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Guyana?
Guyana, at 65,238 t against 62,855 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Guyana?
2,383 t, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Guyana?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Guyana rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and Guyana ranks 47th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Guyana: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/guyana/">Australia and New Zealand vs Guyana: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).