Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Rice — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
62,855 t
in 2050
Malawi
63,385 t
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
50th
Malawi rank
48th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Malawi
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196120052050

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 63,385 t against 62,855 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 530 t.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 48th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 7 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 14,168 t 5,714 t 8,454 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 37,292 t 21,868 t 15,424 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 58,938 t 13,230 t 45,707 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 72,446 t 19,170 t 53,276 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 41,197 t 29,308 t 11,890 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 34,948 t 34,778 t 170.33 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 22,664 t 41,752 t 19,088 t Malawi
2030s 51,635 t 47,446 t 4,189 t Australia and New Zealand
2050s 62,855 t 63,385 t 530.2 t Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Malawi?
Malawi, at 63,385 t against 62,855 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
530 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Malawi?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Malawi rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 48th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/malawi/">Australia and New Zealand vs Malawi: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).