Congo vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)

Congo
867.43 t
in 2050
Zimbabwe
795.39 t
in 2050
Congo rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
114th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196120052050

How they compare

Congo currently reports 867.43 t against 795.39 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 72.04 t.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 150 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 7 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,270 t 1,036 t 1,234 t Congo
1970s 2,218 t 686.12 t 1,532 t Congo
1980s 819.5 t 180.4 t 639.1 t Congo
1990s 939.12 t 112.42 t 826.71 t Congo
2000s 1,064 t 358.44 t 705.43 t Congo
2010s 1,125 t 1,698 t 572.22 t Zimbabwe
2020s 971.3 t 701.11 t 270.19 t Congo
2030s 595.05 t 671.21 t 76.16 t Zimbabwe
2050s 867.43 t 795.39 t 72.04 t Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 867.43 t against 795.39 t in Zimbabwe as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Congo and Zimbabwe?
72.04 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Congo ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).