Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Oceania: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
339,334 t
in 2050
Oceania
66,228 t
in 2050
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
32nd
Oceania rank
31st

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Oceania
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196120052050

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 339,334 t against 66,228 t in Oceania, a difference of 273,106 t.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 5.1 times Oceania's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 32nd and Oceania ranks 31st of 150 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Oceania Difference Ahead
1960s 67,759 t 20,231 t 47,528 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
1970s 145,558 t 43,327 t 102,230 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
1980s 199,978 t 66,154 t 133,824 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
1990s 277,444 t 77,904 t 199,541 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 232,316 t 44,999 t 187,317 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 672,221 t 37,243 t 634,978 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 884,245 t 25,124 t 859,121 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2030s 285,283 t 55,002 t 230,282 t Democratic Republic of the Congo
2050s 339,334 t 66,228 t 273,106 t Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Oceania?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 339,334 t against 66,228 t in Oceania as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Oceania?
273,106 t, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Oceania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Oceania rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 32nd and Oceania ranks 31st of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Oceania: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/oceania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/oceania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Oceania: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).