El Salvador vs Yugoslav SFR: Rice — Burning crop residues
Rice — Burning crop residues over time
- El Salvador
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 4,781 t against 3,887 t in El Salvador, a difference of 894 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, El Salvador has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 86th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 84th of 134 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,716 t | 3,116 t | 5,600 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 7,153 t | 4,296 t | 2,857 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 7,703 t | 4,784 t | 2,919 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 8,406 t | 4,832 t | 3,574 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, El Salvador or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 4,781 t against 3,887 t in El Salvador as of 1991.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between El Salvador and Yugoslav SFR?
- 894 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do El Salvador and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
- El Salvador ranks 86th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 84th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).