Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues

Eswatini
88.44 t
in 2050
Papua New Guinea
189.12 t
in 2050
Eswatini rank
108th
Papua New Guinea rank
107th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Eswatini
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k196120052050

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 189.12 t against 88.44 t in Eswatini, a difference of 100.68 t.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 1,284 t 279.28 t 1,005 t Eswatini
1970s 994.79 t 273.35 t 721.44 t Eswatini
1980s 349.63 t 144.1 t 205.53 t Eswatini
1990s 98.84 t 193.38 t 94.54 t Papua New Guinea
2000s 62.04 t 222.97 t 160.93 t Papua New Guinea
2010s 145.09 t 224.89 t 79.8 t Papua New Guinea
2020s 175.31 t 226.6 t 51.29 t Papua New Guinea
2030s 89.91 t 188.68 t 98.77 t Papua New Guinea
2050s 88.44 t 189.12 t 100.68 t Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Eswatini or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 189.12 t against 88.44 t in Eswatini as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
100.68 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Papua New Guinea?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Eswatini and Papua New Guinea rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Eswatini ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 107th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/eswatini/papua-new-guinea/">Eswatini vs Papua New Guinea: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).