Micronesia vs Northern Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues

Micronesia
50.61 t
in 2050
Northern Africa
555,142 t
in 2050
Micronesia rank
16th
Northern Africa rank
19th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Micronesia
  • Northern Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196120052050

How they compare

Northern Africa currently reports 555,142 t against 50.61 t in Micronesia, a difference of 555,091 t.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Northern Africa has been ahead every year.

Micronesia ranks 16th and Northern Africa ranks 19th of 18 countries.

Northern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia Northern Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 44.66 t 336,128 t 336,084 t Northern Africa
2000s 48.29 t 362,150 t 362,102 t Northern Africa
2010s 52.2 t 305,034 t 304,982 t Northern Africa
2020s 54.17 t 295,272 t 295,218 t Northern Africa
2030s 51.2 t 496,275 t 496,224 t Northern Africa
2050s 50.61 t 555,142 t 555,091 t Northern Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Micronesia or Northern Africa?
Northern Africa, at 555,142 t against 50.61 t in Micronesia as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Micronesia and Northern Africa?
555,091 t, with Northern Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Northern Africa?
31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2050.
How do Micronesia and Northern Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Micronesia ranks 16th and Northern Africa ranks 19th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs Northern Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/micronesia/northern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/micronesia/northern-africa/">Micronesia vs Northern Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).