OECD vs Western Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues

OECD
2.33 million t
in 2050
Western Africa
5.34 million t
in 2050
OECD rank
11th
Western Africa rank
10th

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • OECD
  • Western Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M196120052050

How they compare

Western Africa currently reports 5.34 million t against 2.33 million t in OECD, a difference of 3.02 million t.

That makes Western Africa's figure about 2.3 times OECD's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD ahead.

OECD ranks 11th and Western Africa ranks 10th of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, OECD averaged higher in 4 and Western Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD Western Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 3.18 million t 850,911 t 2.33 million t OECD
1970s 3.04 million t 1.06 million t 1.98 million t OECD
1980s 2.92 million t 1.47 million t 1.45 million t OECD
1990s 2.79 million t 2.15 million t 634,131 t OECD
2000s 2.52 million t 2.67 million t 154,685 t Western Africa
2010s 2.30 million t 4.60 million t 2.31 million t Western Africa
2020s 2.14 million t 5.70 million t 3.57 million t Western Africa
2030s 2.51 million t 4.14 million t 1.63 million t Western Africa
2050s 2.33 million t 5.34 million t 3.02 million t Western Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, OECD or Western Africa?
Western Africa, at 5.34 million t against 2.33 million t in OECD as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between OECD and Western Africa?
3.02 million t, with Western Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD and Western Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do OECD and Western Africa rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
OECD ranks 11th and Western Africa ranks 10th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD vs Western Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/oecd/western-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/oecd/western-africa/">OECD vs Western Africa: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).