Rwanda vs Uzbekistan: Rice — Burning crop residues
Rice — Burning crop residues over time
- Rwanda
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 29,901 t against 29,142 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 759 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Rwanda ranks 62nd and Uzbekistan ranks 63rd of 134 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,947 t | 95,488 t | 93,541 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 6,127 t | 31,787 t | 25,660 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 13,447 t | 32,062 t | 18,615 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 17,351 t | 25,421 t | 8,070 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2030s | 19,482 t | 31,170 t | 11,688 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2050s | 29,901 t | 29,142 t | 759 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Rwanda or Uzbekistan?
- Rwanda, at 29,901 t against 29,142 t in Uzbekistan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Rwanda and Uzbekistan?
- 759 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uzbekistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Rwanda and Uzbekistan rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
- Rwanda ranks 62nd and Uzbekistan ranks 63rd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).