Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues

Solomon Islands
446.72 t
in 2050
Zimbabwe
795.39 t
in 2050
Solomon Islands rank
104th
Zimbabwe rank
101st

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • Solomon Islands
  • Zimbabwe
01.0k2.0k3.0k196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 795.39 t against 446.72 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 348.67 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.8 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Solomon Islands ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Solomon Islands averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Solomon Islands Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 170.81 t 1,036 t 865.03 t Zimbabwe
1970s 689.04 t 686.12 t 2.91 t Solomon Islands
1980s 1,134 t 180.4 t 954.08 t Solomon Islands
1990s 300.08 t 112.42 t 187.66 t Solomon Islands
2000s 463.32 t 358.44 t 104.88 t Solomon Islands
2010s 757.85 t 1,698 t 939.84 t Zimbabwe
2020s 796.67 t 701.11 t 95.56 t Solomon Islands
2030s 445.68 t 671.21 t 225.53 t Zimbabwe
2050s 446.72 t 795.39 t 348.67 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Solomon Islands or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 795.39 t against 446.72 t in Solomon Islands as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
348.67 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Solomon Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Solomon Islands ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/solomon-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/solomon-islands/zimbabwe/">Solomon Islands vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).