South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues

South Africa
566.39 t
in 2050
Zimbabwe
795.39 t
in 2050
South Africa rank
103rd
Zimbabwe rank
101st

Rice — Burning crop residues over time

  • South Africa
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 795.39 t against 566.39 t in South Africa, a difference of 229 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 134 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 745.56 t 1,036 t 290.28 t Zimbabwe
1970s 715 t 686.12 t 28.88 t South Africa
1980s 715 t 180.4 t 534.6 t South Africa
1990s 747.01 t 112.42 t 634.59 t South Africa
2000s 706.14 t 358.44 t 347.71 t South Africa
2010s 622.38 t 1,698 t 1,075 t Zimbabwe
2020s 592.08 t 701.11 t 109.04 t Zimbabwe
2030s 632.4 t 671.21 t 38.81 t Zimbabwe
2050s 566.39 t 795.39 t 229.01 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, South Africa or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 795.39 t against 566.39 t in South Africa as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between South Africa and Zimbabwe?
229 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do South Africa and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
South Africa ranks 103rd and Zimbabwe ranks 101st of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/south-africa/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/south-africa/zimbabwe/">South Africa vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).