Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square

Mauritius
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
100th
Zimbabwe rank
97th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0003 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 120 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.007 t per square kilometre 0.0027 t per square kilometre 0.0043 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0412 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0394 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.006 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0056 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0474 t per square kilometre 0.0044 t per square kilometre 0.043 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre 0.0018 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0003 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0.0003 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square?
Mauritius ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 120 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
122 places, 6,272 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.