Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
0.0003 t per square kilometre
Change on year
down 79.5%
World rank
97th
of 120 countries
All-time high
0.0066 t per square kilometre
in 2015
All-time low
0.0001 t per square kilometre
in 1985
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe is 0.0003 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 79.5% on the previous year and down 92.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.0066 t per square kilometre in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 t per square kilometre, in 1985.
That places Zimbabwe 97th out of 120 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1968 | 0.0033 t per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0036 t per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0038 t per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0037 t per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 1972 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1973 | 0.0017 t per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1975 | 0.0012 t per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1978 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 1983 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +34.4% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +107.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1991 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1995 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1996 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +27.5% |
| 2000 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2002 | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2003 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | +32.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0008 t per square kilometre | +18.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | +15.8% |
| 2006 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | +20.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0022 t per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0027 t per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 2012 | 0.004 t per square kilometre | +48.2% |
| 2013 | 0.0042 t per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2014 | 0.0053 t per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0066 t per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2017 | 0.005 t per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0048 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2019 | 0.0036 t per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0049 t per square kilometre | +996.8% |
| 2022 | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | -68.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -79.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0027 t per square kilometre | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | 0.0036 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0038 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0005 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0009 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0044 t per square kilometre | 0.0022 t per square kilometre | 0.0066 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0018 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0049 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 94 Somalia 0.0009 t per square kilometre compare
- 95 Papua New Guinea 0.0005 t per square kilometre compare
- 96 South Africa 0.0005 t per square kilometre compare
- 98 Saudi Arabia 0.0001 t per square kilometre compare
- 99 Algeria 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 100 Albania 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 100 Belgium 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Cyprus 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Czechia 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Germany 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Denmark 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Estonia 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Finland 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Croatia 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Ireland 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Jamaica 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 100 Lithuania 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Luxembourg 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Latvia 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Malta 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Mauritius 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 100 Poland 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Slovakia 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Slovenia 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Sweden 0 t per square kilometre
- 100 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 t per square kilometre compare
More climate change data for Zimbabwe
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 178.46 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,716 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,805 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11,912 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 21.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 425.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,483 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 137.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.08 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe?
- Rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square in Zimbabwe was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0066 t per square kilometre in 2015.
- What is the lowest rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 t per square kilometre in 1985.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square?
- Zimbabwe ranks 97th out of 120 countries with data for 2023.
- Is rice — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), per square rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 92.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Rice — Burning crop residues Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Rice — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.