Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0.1921 kt
in 2050
OECD
0.1628 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
OECD rank
11th

Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • OECD
00.050.10.150.20.25196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 0.1921 kt against 0.1628 kt in OECD, a difference of 0.0293 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.2 times OECD's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was OECD ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and OECD ranks 11th of 32 groups.

Across the 9 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and OECD in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) OECD Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0935 kt 0.2229 kt 0.1294 kt OECD
1970s 0.0982 kt 0.2125 kt 0.1143 kt OECD
1980s 0.102 kt 0.2043 kt 0.1023 kt OECD
1990s 0.1237 kt 0.195 kt 0.0713 kt OECD
2000s 0.1417 kt 0.1764 kt 0.0347 kt OECD
2010s 0.1732 kt 0.1609 kt 0.0123 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.1954 kt 0.1497 kt 0.0458 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.1733 kt 0.1755 kt 0.0022 kt OECD
2050s 0.1921 kt 0.1628 kt 0.0293 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — burning crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or OECD?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 0.1921 kt against 0.1628 kt in OECD as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — burning crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD?
0.0293 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and OECD rank globally for rice — burning crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and OECD ranks 11th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Rice — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-burning-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/oecd/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs OECD: Rice — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Burning crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
184 places, 10,111 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).