Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.146 kt
in 2050
Nicaragua
0.1279 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
43rd
Nicaragua rank
46th

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.3196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.146 kt against 0.1279 kt in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0181 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Nicaragua ranks 46th of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 8 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0294 kt 0.0144 kt 0.0151 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.0694 kt 0.0181 kt 0.0513 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.118 kt 0.0285 kt 0.0895 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.1742 kt 0.0424 kt 0.1318 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.1017 kt 0.0604 kt 0.0413 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.0956 kt 0.0736 kt 0.022 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.0629 kt 0.0835 kt 0.0206 kt Nicaragua
2030s 0.1193 kt 0.108 kt 0.0113 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.146 kt 0.1279 kt 0.0181 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Nicaragua?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.146 kt against 0.1279 kt in Nicaragua as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua?
0.0181 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua rank globally for rice — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Nicaragua ranks 46th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/nicaragua/">Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).