China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2050
Eswatini
0.0001 kt
in 2050
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
113th
Eswatini rank
110th

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Eswatini
00.0020.0040.0060.008196120052050

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 113th and Eswatini ranks 110th of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.005 kt 0.0015 kt 0.0036 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 0.0014 kt 0.0012 kt 0.0002 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 0 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0005 kt Eswatini
1990s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Eswatini
2000s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Eswatini
2010s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Eswatini
2020s 0 kt 0.0002 kt 0.0002 kt Eswatini
2030s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Eswatini
2050s 0 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
0.0001 kt, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini rank globally for rice — crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 113th and Eswatini ranks 110th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).