Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.1788 kt
in 2050
Nicaragua
0.1567 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
43rd
Nicaragua rank
46th

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Nicaragua
00.10.20.3196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.1788 kt against 0.1567 kt in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0221 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Nicaragua ranks 46th of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 8 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.036 kt 0.0176 kt 0.0184 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.0851 kt 0.0221 kt 0.0629 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.1445 kt 0.0348 kt 0.1097 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.2134 kt 0.052 kt 0.1614 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.1246 kt 0.074 kt 0.0506 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.1172 kt 0.0902 kt 0.027 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.077 kt 0.1023 kt 0.0253 kt Nicaragua
2030s 0.1461 kt 0.1323 kt 0.0138 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.1788 kt 0.1567 kt 0.0221 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Nicaragua?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.1788 kt against 0.1567 kt in Nicaragua as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua?
0.0221 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Nicaragua rank globally for rice — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Nicaragua ranks 46th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/nicaragua/">Australia and New Zealand vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).