Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Rice — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0328 kt
in 2050
Cuba
0.0341 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
43rd
Cuba rank
42nd

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Cuba
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0341 kt against 0.0328 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0013 kt.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Cuba ranks 42nd of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0066 kt 0.0103 kt 0.0037 kt Cuba
1970s 0.0156 kt 0.023 kt 0.0073 kt Cuba
1980s 0.0265 kt 0.0245 kt 0.002 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.0392 kt 0.0237 kt 0.0155 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.0229 kt 0.0261 kt 0.0032 kt Cuba
2010s 0.0215 kt 0.0246 kt 0.0031 kt Cuba
2020s 0.0141 kt 0.0093 kt 0.0049 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 0.0268 kt 0.0269 kt 0.0001 kt Cuba
2050s 0.0328 kt 0.0341 kt 0.0013 kt Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Cuba?
Cuba, at 0.0341 kt against 0.0328 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
0.0013 kt, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Cuba?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Cuba rank globally for rice — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 43rd and Cuba ranks 42nd of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/cuba/">Australia and New Zealand vs Cuba: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).