Australia vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues

Australia
0.0328 kt
in 2050
Nicaragua
0.0288 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
43rd
Nicaragua rank
46th

Rice — Crop residues over time

  • Australia
  • Nicaragua
00.020.040.06196120052050

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0328 kt against 0.0288 kt in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.004 kt.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 43rd and Nicaragua ranks 46th of 115 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 8 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0066 kt 0.0032 kt 0.0034 kt Australia
1970s 0.0156 kt 0.0041 kt 0.0116 kt Australia
1980s 0.0265 kt 0.0064 kt 0.0201 kt Australia
1990s 0.0392 kt 0.0095 kt 0.0297 kt Australia
2000s 0.0229 kt 0.0136 kt 0.0093 kt Australia
2010s 0.0215 kt 0.0166 kt 0.0049 kt Australia
2020s 0.0141 kt 0.0188 kt 0.0047 kt Nicaragua
2030s 0.0268 kt 0.0243 kt 0.0025 kt Australia
2050s 0.0328 kt 0.0288 kt 0.004 kt Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher rice — crop residues, Australia or Nicaragua?
Australia, at 0.0328 kt against 0.0288 kt in Nicaragua as of 2050.
What is the difference in rice — crop residues between Australia and Nicaragua?
0.004 kt, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Nicaragua?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Nicaragua rank globally for rice — crop residues?
Australia ranks 43rd and Nicaragua ranks 46th of 115 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/rice-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/nicaragua/">Australia vs Nicaragua: Rice — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rice — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 9,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).