Australia and New Zealand vs OECD: Savanna fires — Burned Area

Australia and New Zealand
34.24 million ha
in 2024
OECD
42.37 million ha
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
3rd
OECD rank
1st

Savanna fires — Burned Area over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • OECD
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020072024

How they compare

OECD currently reports 42.37 million ha against 34.24 million ha in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 8.13 million ha.

That makes OECD's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 221 countries.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand OECD Difference Ahead
1990s 44.98 million ha 49.52 million ha 4.54 million ha OECD
2000s 53.82 million ha 58.56 million ha 4.74 million ha OECD
2010s 46.21 million ha 51.68 million ha 5.47 million ha OECD
2020s 34.74 million ha 42.08 million ha 7.34 million ha OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Australia and New Zealand or OECD?
OECD, at 42.37 million ha against 34.24 million ha in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Australia and New Zealand and OECD?
8.13 million ha, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and OECD?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and OECD rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 3rd and OECD ranks 1st of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs OECD: Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-burned-area-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/oecd/">Australia and New Zealand vs OECD: Savanna fires — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.