Eswatini vs Nepal: Savanna fires — Burned Area
Eswatini
118,811 ha
in 2024
Nepal
140,096 ha
in 2024
Eswatini rank
60th
Nepal rank
59th
Savanna fires — Burned Area over time
- Eswatini
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 140,096 ha against 118,811 ha in Eswatini, a difference of 21,285 ha.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 59th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60,123 ha | 28,922 ha | 31,202 ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 59,011 ha | 29,551 ha | 29,460 ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 61,988 ha | 47,284 ha | 14,703 ha | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 59,952 ha | 75,930 ha | 15,978 ha | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — burned area, Eswatini or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 140,096 ha against 118,811 ha in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — burned area between Eswatini and Nepal?
- 21,285 ha, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Nepal rank globally for savanna fires — burned area?
- Eswatini ranks 60th and Nepal ranks 59th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.