Australia and New Zealand vs OECD: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)

Australia and New Zealand
96,446 kt
in 2023
OECD
102,966 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
2nd
OECD rank
1st

Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • OECD
25.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k199020062023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 102,966 kt against 96,446 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 6,520 kt.

That makes OECD's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, OECD has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and OECD ranks 1st of 221 countries.

OECD has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand OECD Difference Ahead
1990s 53,014 kt 56,394 kt 3,380 kt OECD
2000s 62,036 kt 65,047 kt 3,011 kt OECD
2010s 54,808 kt 57,948 kt 3,140 kt OECD
2020s 40,985 kt 44,880 kt 3,896 kt OECD

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Australia and New Zealand or OECD?
OECD, at 102,966 kt against 96,446 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Australia and New Zealand and OECD?
6,520 kt, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and OECD?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and OECD rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 2nd and OECD ranks 1st of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs OECD: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/oecd/">Australia and New Zealand vs OECD: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf