Belgium vs Libya: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Belgium
- Libya
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Libya ahead.
Belgium ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0252 kt | 0.1001 kt | 0.0749 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0513 kt | 0.9235 kt | 0.8722 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.015 kt | 0.1841 kt | 0.1691 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Belgium or Libya?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Libya?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Libya rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf