Bhutan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bhutan
1.38 kt
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1.26 kt
in 2023
Bhutan rank
122nd
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
123rd

Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bhutan
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
02.557.510199020062023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 1.38 kt against 1.26 kt in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.12 kt.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Bhutan ranks 122nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 123rd of 256 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 1.32 kt 2.85 kt 1.53 kt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2000s 0.9953 kt 2.35 kt 1.36 kt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 2.02 kt 1.87 kt 0.1432 kt Bhutan
2020s 0.8246 kt 1.34 kt 0.5136 kt United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Bhutan or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Bhutan, at 1.38 kt against 1.26 kt in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Bhutan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0.12 kt, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
Bhutan ranks 122nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 123rd of 256 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bhutan/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bhutan/united-kingdom/">Bhutan vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
290 places, 9,635 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf