Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
3,166 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
5,755 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
21st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k199020062023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 5,755 kt against 3,166 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 2,589 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.8 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 21st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 256 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 1,889 kt 8,530 kt 6,641 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 2,087 kt 9,102 kt 7,014 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 1,806 kt 8,247 kt 6,441 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 2,512 kt 6,332 kt 3,820 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 5,755 kt against 3,166 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
2,589 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 21st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 256 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
290 places, 9,635 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf