Czechia vs Libya: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Czechia
- Libya
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Libya ahead.
Czechia ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0278 kt | 0.452 kt | 0.4242 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.0928 kt | 0.1001 kt | 0.0073 kt | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0588 kt | 0.9235 kt | 0.8647 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0294 kt | 0.1841 kt | 0.1548 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Czechia or Libya?
- Czechia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Czechia and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Libya?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Libya rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Czechia ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf