Latvia vs Libya: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3059 kt | 0.4517 kt | 0.1459 kt | Libya |
| 2000s | 1.01 kt | 0.1001 kt | 0.9137 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.2787 kt | 0.9235 kt | 0.6448 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0493 kt | 0.1841 kt | 0.1349 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Latvia or Libya?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Latvia and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Latvia ranks 142nd and Libya ranks 142nd of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf