Russia vs Sudan: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Russia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 3,844 kt against 3,275 kt in Russia, a difference of 569 kt.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Russia ahead.
Russia ranks 18th and Sudan ranks 16th of 256 countries.
Russia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4,394 kt | 3,336 kt | 1,058 kt | Russia |
| 2020s | 4,520 kt | 3,284 kt | 1,235 kt | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq), Russia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 3,844 kt against 3,275 kt in Russia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) between Russia and Sudan?
- 569 kt, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Russia and Sudan rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Russia ranks 18th and Sudan ranks 16th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf