Belgium-Luxembourg vs Latvia: Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 134th and Latvia ranks 134th of 221 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Belgium-Luxembourg or Latvia?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Belgium-Luxembourg and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Latvia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 134th and Latvia ranks 134th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf