Botswana vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Botswana
5,813 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
42,462 kt
in 2023
Botswana rank
8th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
7th

Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Botswana
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 42,462 kt against 5,813 kt in Botswana, a difference of 36,649 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 7.3 times Botswana's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 221 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 2,835 kt 53,090 kt 50,255 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2,261 kt 55,216 kt 52,955 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2,705 kt 49,238 kt 46,533 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 4,385 kt 44,988 kt 40,603 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Botswana or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 42,462 kt against 5,813 kt in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Botswana and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
36,649 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Botswana ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 7th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/botswana/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/botswana/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Botswana vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf