Central African Republic vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Central African Republic
3,291 kt
in 2023
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
1,003 kt
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
11th
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank
27th

Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199020062023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 3,291 kt against 1,003 kt in Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), a difference of 2,288 kt.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 3.3 times Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 11th and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 27th of 256 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Difference Ahead
1990s 6,148 kt 662.25 kt 5,485 kt Central African Republic
2000s 6,250 kt 793.05 kt 5,457 kt Central African Republic
2010s 5,027 kt 773.95 kt 4,253 kt Central African Republic
2020s 4,333 kt 1,026 kt 3,308 kt Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Central African Republic or Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
Central African Republic, at 3,291 kt against 1,003 kt in Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Central African Republic and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
2,288 kt, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Central African Republic ranks 11th and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 27th of 256 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/central-african-republic/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/">Central African Republic vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
290 places, 9,635 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf