Austria vs Iceland: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Austria
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2007
Austria rank
141st
Iceland rank
141st
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Austria
- Iceland
How they compare
Austria currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 141st and Iceland ranks 141st of 172 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Austria or Iceland?
- Austria, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Austria and Iceland?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Iceland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Austria and Iceland rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Austria ranks 141st and Iceland ranks 141st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.