Belgium-Luxembourg vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Belgium-Luxembourg
-100 % change on previous year
in 1996
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
141st
Sweden rank
141st
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 172 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Belgium-Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 1996.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Belgium-Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.