Denmark vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Denmark
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Denmark rank
141st
Sweden rank
141st
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Denmark
- Sweden
How they compare
Denmark currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
Denmark ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 172 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -16.67 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 2000s | 250 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 350 % change on previous year | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Denmark or Sweden?
- Denmark, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2008.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Denmark and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2007.
- How do Denmark and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Denmark ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.