Ecuador vs New Zealand: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Ecuador
439.58 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
500 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
7th
New Zealand rank
5th

Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 500 % change on previous year against 439.58 % change on previous year in Ecuador, a difference of 60.42 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Ecuador ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 5th of 172 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s -6.8 % change on previous year -11.11 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year Ecuador
2000s 56.56 % change on previous year 16.15 % change on previous year 40.4 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 126.03 % change on previous year 96.78 % change on previous year 29.26 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s 80.13 % change on previous year 77.85 % change on previous year 2.28 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Ecuador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 500 % change on previous year against 439.58 % change on previous year in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Ecuador and New Zealand?
60.42 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
28 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Ecuador ranks 7th and New Zealand ranks 5th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 6,085 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.