Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Eswatini
143.92 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-7.68 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
21st
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
18th

Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Eswatini
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 143.92 % change on previous year against -7.68 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 151.6 % change on previous year.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 18.7 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Eswatini ranks 21st and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th of 172 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1.44 % change on previous year 2.69 % change on previous year 1.25 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 27.1 % change on previous year -1.92 % change on previous year 29.02 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s 28.96 % change on previous year 3.05 % change on previous year 25.9 % change on previous year Eswatini
2020s 26.49 % change on previous year 2.67 % change on previous year 23.82 % change on previous year Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Eswatini or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Eswatini, at 143.92 % change on previous year against -7.68 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
151.6 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Eswatini ranks 21st and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 6,085 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.