Iceland vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2007
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Iceland rank
141st
Sweden rank
141st
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Iceland
- Sweden
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sweden ahead.
Iceland ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 172 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 % change on previous year | -28.57 % change on previous year | 28.57 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -100 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Iceland or Sweden?
- Iceland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2007.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Iceland and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2007.
- How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Iceland ranks 141st and Sweden ranks 141st of 172 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.