Brunei vs Montenegro: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Brunei
- Montenegro
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Montenegro, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Brunei ranks 160th and Montenegro ranks 160th of 256 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0084 kt | 0.0084 kt | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0075 kt | 0.0075 kt | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0072 kt | 0.0072 kt | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Brunei or Montenegro?
- Brunei, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Brunei and Montenegro?
- 0 kt, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Brunei and Montenegro rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Brunei ranks 160th and Montenegro ranks 160th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf