China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Savanna fires — Emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
134th
Latvia rank
134th

Savanna fires — Emissions over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Latvia
00.0030.0050.0070.01199020062023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 134th and Latvia ranks 134th of 221 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0004 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0001 kt Latvia
2000s 0.0006 kt 0.0018 kt 0.0012 kt Latvia
2010s 0.0004 kt 0.0005 kt 0.0001 kt Latvia
2020s 0.0002 kt 0.0001 kt 0.0001 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 134th and Latvia ranks 134th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Savanna fires — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1-2/china-hong-kong-sar/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1-2/china-hong-kong-sar/latvia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Savanna fires — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,129 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf