Ireland vs Libya: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Ireland
- Libya
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 134th and Libya ranks 134th of 221 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.003 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0022 kt | Ireland |
| 2000s | 0.0007 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0005 kt | Ireland |
| 2010s | 0.002 kt | 0.0016 kt | 0.0004 kt | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0 kt | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Ireland or Libya?
- Ireland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Ireland and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Libya?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Libya rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Ireland ranks 134th and Libya ranks 134th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf