Mauritius vs Reunion: Savanna fires — Emissions
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Mauritius
- Reunion
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Reunion, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Reunion ahead.
Mauritius ranks 160th and Reunion ranks 160th of 256 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Reunion in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Reunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Reunion |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Reunion |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Mauritius or Reunion?
- Mauritius, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Reunion as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Mauritius and Reunion?
- 0 kt, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Reunion?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Reunion rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Mauritius ranks 160th and Reunion ranks 160th of 256 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf