Angola vs Botswana: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Angola
0.7%
in 2015
Botswana
0.7%
in 2015
Angola rank
30th
Botswana rank
29th

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Angola
  • Botswana
0.20.40.60.8199020022015

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in Angola, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 30th and Botswana ranks 29th of 217 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7% 0.5% 0.3% Angola
2000s 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% Angola
2010s 0.7% 0.3% 0.4% Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Angola or Botswana?
Botswana, at 0.7% against 0.7% in Angola as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Angola and Botswana?
0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Botswana?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Angola and Botswana rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Angola ranks 30th and Botswana ranks 29th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.