Belize vs Equatorial Guinea: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Belize
0.0%
in 2015
Equatorial Guinea
0.0%
in 2015
Belize rank
142nd
Equatorial Guinea rank
139th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Belize
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Belize, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belize ahead.
Belize ranks 142nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Belize |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Belize |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Belize or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Belize as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Equatorial Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Belize and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Belize ranks 142nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 139th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.