Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Guinea-Bissau: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.3 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 144th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th of 217 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Guinea-Bissau?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea-Bissau?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 144th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 147th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.