Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Slovenia: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.0%
in 2015
Slovenia
0.0%
in 2015
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
144th
Slovenia rank
145th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Slovenia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovenia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 144th and Slovenia ranks 145th of 217 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Slovenia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Slovenia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 144th and Slovenia ranks 145th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.