Brunei vs Solomon Islands: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Brunei
0.0%
in 2015
Solomon Islands
0.0%
in 2015
Brunei rank
155th
Solomon Islands rank
157th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Brunei
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Brunei's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Brunei has been ahead every year.
Brunei ranks 155th and Solomon Islands ranks 157th of 217 countries.
Brunei has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Brunei |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Brunei |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Brunei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Brunei or Solomon Islands?
- Brunei, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Brunei and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Solomon Islands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Brunei and Solomon Islands rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Brunei ranks 155th and Solomon Islands ranks 157th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.