Czechia vs Turkmenistan: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Czechia
0.1%
in 2015
Turkmenistan
0.2%
in 2015
Czechia rank
84th
Turkmenistan rank
83rd
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Czechia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 0.2% against 0.1% in Czechia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 84th and Turkmenistan ranks 83rd of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Czechia or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 0.2% against 0.1% in Czechia as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Czechia and Turkmenistan?
- 0.1%, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Turkmenistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Czechia and Turkmenistan rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Czechia ranks 84th and Turkmenistan ranks 83rd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.