Dominican Republic vs Namibia: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Dominican Republic
0.1%
in 2015
Namibia
0.1%
in 2015
Dominican Republic rank
108th
Namibia rank
107th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Dominican Republic
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.1% against 0.1% in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Namibia ranks 107th of 217 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Dominican Republic or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.1% against 0.1% in Dominican Republic as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Dominican Republic and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Dominican Republic and Namibia rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Dominican Republic ranks 108th and Namibia ranks 107th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.